Fixed parallel voxelization flag#101
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @civanch for branch cms/v11.4.0. @akritkbehera, @cmsbuild, @iarspider, @raoatifshad, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
thanks @civanch , so this is not to fix the hanging tests? Note that relvals/addon and unit tests still hangs for Geant4 11.4 cms-sw/cmssw#49615 (comment) ( even with your fix in cmssw : cms-sw/cmssw#49615) |
|
@smuzaffar , if we exclude cms-sw/cmssw#49615? |
|
please test for CMSSW_16_0_GEANT4_X lets tests it without cms-sw/cmssw#49615 |
|
please test for CMSSW_16_0_G4VECGEOM_X |
|
please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#10243 for CMSSW_16_0_GEANT4_X @civanch , looks like tests did not hang without cms-sw/cmssw#49615. Let me re-run the tests with cmsdist PR which also has new geant4 data |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d94d74/49978/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d94d74/49976/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+externals thesis for special Geant4 IBs |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next cms/v11.4.0 IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d94d74/49978/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
CMS unit tests crash if the default value of the parallel initialization flag is used. This PR fix the issue.